Larry sent this video to me and we thought this would be a good video to view for NIOTers. See everyone Monday, Fern.
Noliwe Rooks, the associate director of Princeton’s newly rejuvenated Center for African American Studies: “There are still too few places where someone is taking responsibility for sharing accurate information about America and race. Someone needs to tell people about the America that has gotten us to this point, so that we know enough to move forward. That’s what we’re doing here (at the center).”
Yes, there is a gap between what people know about race and the reality. Princeton’s center, new director Eddie Glaude Jr. at the helm, aims to lead the way to close that gap. Not in Our Town and the Princeton Public Library are trying to fill that gap on a local level with “Continuing Conversations on Race and White Privilege,” held on first Mondays.
The dialogue on race and white privilege begun earlier this spring at Not In Our Town’s series “Engaging Together to Explore White Privilege.” There is no need to have attended any of the series’ sessions to participate. This will be a “drop-in” format, facilitated by members of the Princeton-based interracial and interfaith social action group. Topics will include how we feel about the term “white privilege,” and issues relevant to our community and nation.
The next NIOT sessions are Jan. 4 and Feb. 1, 7:30 p.m.
The library hosts Jennifer Baszile, author of “The Black Girl Next Door,” on Sunday, February 7, at 2 p.m. From the program: “Baszile’s memoir is about her childhood in an affluent Southern California suburb as a post-segregation child in a not-quite-integrated world. In trips to her parents’ childhood homes in Louisiana and Detroit, she sees their very different American pasts. Baszile followed the path her parents set out to become the first black female professor at Yale University, in its history department.”
The next dates for Princeton’s African American Study Center are January 18, March 9, and April 13.
Elsewhere on the campus, the Office of Population Research in Wallace Hall hosts Thomas Espenshade for a noon lecture on “Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience,” on Tuesday, December 15. Wallace Hall is located on the diagonal line between the Woodrow Wilson School’s Robertson Hall on Washington Road and the Friend Center on Olden Street.
Too few places to talk? In Princeton we seem to have plenty of talking opportunities. All we need are the talkers.
A main item on the agenda of the Princeton Borough Council meeting on Tuesday, December 8, was a proposed ordinance concerning what would be the best
structure for the Borough supervision of the police department. The focus was on whether the appropriate body
would be the Borough Administrator or a Public Safety Committee (PSC) consisting of some members of the Council.
Four members of the public spoke about their views. Maria Juega spoke on behalf of the Latin American Legal Defense Fund and Ann Yasuhara spoke
on behalf of Not In Our Town; both emphasized the importance of establishing regular avenues of communication between the public and the PSC. This is what Ann said:
To: Princeton Borough Council December 8, 2009
From: Not In Our Town
Good evening. My name is Ann Yasuhara and I live at 66 Pine Street in the Borough. I am here representing Not In Our Town.
We are pleased that the Council now seems to be considering having a Public Safety Committee that will be the “appropriate authority” to which the Police Department is to report and which will be the policy making body with respect to Police Department activities.
The Council members are the persons who live among us, whom we meet on the street, and who are more likely than the Boro Administrator to have a sense of what is and is not working for the members of the community. These matters are more subtle than bureaucratic; harder to describe or write about, but very important.
Although it is not in the ordinance before us this evening, Not In Our Town urges that as part of its duties the Public Safety Committee will open up some avenues for direct communication between its members and members of the community. There needs to be a way for members of the community to sit down with that group, at least a few times a year as well as on an emergency basis, to talk about their concerns, review policy and its implementation, and consider new or different policies that address those concerns. We think that with such a structure as part of the PSC, our group as well as many individuals and other groups will feel more cared about and cared for and that such interactions will improve the facts as well as the feelings about how our community can thrive. This is not about improving image, it is about improving how we actually live our lives here.
We definitely appreciate the comments of Mr. Martindell at the last meeting that no matter how terrific the structure of oversight may be, if the people designated to do that oversight do not do the work, the terrificness will not matter. Of course it is hard work and often quite challenging. But we certainly hope that there are some among you who think it is deeply important and are willing to make it work.
Please let us not rush. Please, dear Borough Council members, take this opportunity to find a really good way to establish a Public Safety Committee that will contribute seriously to making this is a community where everyone is safe and respected.
The Borough Council finally passed the ordinance making a Public Safety Committee [composed of 2 members of the BC to be appointed by the Mayor with the consent of the Borough Council + the Mayor and the Borough Administrator – both ex-officio] to be the appropriate authority and the Borough Administrator to look after disciplinary actions.
“The Borough Council seemed very interested in involving the public in some regular fashion, yet to be determined, in their policy and investigative function,” says Ann.
I’ve been thinking a lot about the difference between ‘being advantaged’ and ‘white privilege’. I think there is an important distinction. Being advantaged – or disadvantaged – usually is associated with having high/low socio-economic status. White privilege is something different. It is a fact that Afro-Americans are disproportionally disadvantaged and that fact is surely related to their unique historical experience – 200 years of slavery, plus 100 years of apartheid. But, that isn’t really what white privilege means. A poor, unskilled, unemployed, (disadvantaged) white workingman can still benefit from white privilege. And, a highly educated, high income, (advantaged) professional A-A woman can still suffer from ‘white privilege’.
Maybe this distinction is not that important – but I have found in conversations about race if you try to talk about the effects of the A-A historical experience, you will often get responses like “I (or my parents) came with nothing, had to struggle etc.”
I would like to get better at explaining how ‘white privilege’ is still alive in these days and that A-A persons, no matter how advantaged in socio-economic terms, are still hurt by encounters with ‘white privilege’. MT